<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compiled vs interpreted languages and why I sometimes wish Actionscript was interpreted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/2009/06/06/compiled-vs-interpreted-languages-and-why-i-sometimes-wish-actionscript-was-interpreted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/2009/06/06/compiled-vs-interpreted-languages-and-why-i-sometimes-wish-actionscript-was-interpreted/</link>
	<description>"I write pretty software"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:34:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: arpit</title>
		<link>http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/2009/06/06/compiled-vs-interpreted-languages-and-why-i-sometimes-wish-actionscript-was-interpreted/comment-page-1/#comment-58275</link>
		<dc:creator>arpit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/?p=237#comment-58275</guid>
		<description>@Don,
Yeah I was recently made aware of &quot;with&quot; again, didnt realize that it was still around. For some reason I found it ugly before, mostly because to make it readable it still required a newline. I like the period at the end of an instruction but with may be the way to go, and wont really require any work at the framework end :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Don,<br />
Yeah I was recently made aware of &#8220;with&#8221; again, didnt realize that it was still around. For some reason I found it ugly before, mostly because to make it readable it still required a newline. I like the period at the end of an instruction but with may be the way to go, and wont really require any work at the framework end <img src='http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don-Duong Quach</title>
		<link>http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/2009/06/06/compiled-vs-interpreted-languages-and-why-i-sometimes-wish-actionscript-was-interpreted/comment-page-1/#comment-58141</link>
		<dc:creator>Don-Duong Quach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 05:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/?p=237#comment-58141</guid>
		<description>I take it back the * type wouldn&#039;t make a difference.  What about using the &quot;with&quot; keyword in place of chaining?

with(myButton) setSize(200,200),setVisible(true),setLabel(”print”),setIcon(printer_png_instance);</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take it back the * type wouldn&#8217;t make a difference.  What about using the &#8220;with&#8221; keyword in place of chaining?</p>
<p>with(myButton) setSize(200,200),setVisible(true),setLabel(”print”),setIcon(printer_png_instance);</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don-Duong Quach</title>
		<link>http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/2009/06/06/compiled-vs-interpreted-languages-and-why-i-sometimes-wish-actionscript-was-interpreted/comment-page-1/#comment-58140</link>
		<dc:creator>Don-Duong Quach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/?p=237#comment-58140</guid>
		<description>Instead of returning Object could you return * and avoid the performance hit?  How bad is the performance hit anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of returning Object could you return * and avoid the performance hit?  How bad is the performance hit anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video &#124; Enjolt.com &#124; Innovate for Success</title>
		<link>http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/2009/06/06/compiled-vs-interpreted-languages-and-why-i-sometimes-wish-actionscript-was-interpreted/comment-page-1/#comment-57114</link>
		<dc:creator>Video &#124; Enjolt.com &#124; Innovate for Success</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 19:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/?p=237#comment-57114</guid>
		<description>[...] with flash &#8230; Updates Vars From Actionscript To Php Update Php And Apache Tournament Website   Compiled vs interpreted languages and why I sometimes wish Actionscript was interpreted - arpitonline.com 06/06/2009 Its always interesting to see the conflict between developers who love [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with flash &#8230; Updates Vars From Actionscript To Php Update Php And Apache Tournament Website   Compiled vs interpreted languages and why I sometimes wish Actionscript was interpreted &#8211; arpitonline.com 06/06/2009 Its always interesting to see the conflict between developers who love [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Li</title>
		<link>http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/2009/06/06/compiled-vs-interpreted-languages-and-why-i-sometimes-wish-actionscript-was-interpreted/comment-page-1/#comment-57096</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 11:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/?p=237#comment-57096</guid>
		<description>We have as3Query actually. But I haven&#039;t tried it yet, so I don&#039;t know its performance.

http://tech.nitoyon.com/blog/2008/01/as3query_alpha.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have as3Query actually. But I haven&#8217;t tried it yet, so I don&#8217;t know its performance.</p>
<p><a href="http://tech.nitoyon.com/blog/2008/01/as3query_alpha.html" rel="nofollow">http://tech.nitoyon.com/blog/2008/01/as3query_alpha.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
