<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Poll: Whats your favorite Flex feature ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/2008/08/10/quick-poll-whats-your-favorite-flex-feature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/2008/08/10/quick-poll-whats-your-favorite-flex-feature/</link>
	<description>"I write pretty software"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:32:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: arpit</title>
		<link>http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/2008/08/10/quick-poll-whats-your-favorite-flex-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-42781</link>
		<dc:creator>arpit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 01:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/?p=145#comment-42781</guid>
		<description>@polyGeek:
I know what you mean about all the features, I know I am really addicted to most of the features above. However off late there have been some times when I have almost been willing to trade some of the features for some richer UI capabilities (non chuggy animation, lists that actually scroll, etc) and a lighter swf. A lot of the projects my team works on are smaller widgets and Flex is just not an alternative. But I am working on some code that may be close enough to Flex to actually be a viable option. We are planning to open source the code so the question is what would make it attractive to Flex devs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@polyGeek:<br />
I know what you mean about all the features, I know I am really addicted to most of the features above. However off late there have been some times when I have almost been willing to trade some of the features for some richer UI capabilities (non chuggy animation, lists that actually scroll, etc) and a lighter swf. A lot of the projects my team works on are smaller widgets and Flex is just not an alternative. But I am working on some code that may be close enough to Flex to actually be a viable option. We are planning to open source the code so the question is what would make it attractive to Flex devs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polyGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/2008/08/10/quick-poll-whats-your-favorite-flex-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-42780</link>
		<dc:creator>polyGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arpitonline.com/blog/?p=145#comment-42780</guid>
		<description>What a tough question to answer. How could we live without any of those. Take just one of them away and we just have &#039;Fex&#039;.

In thinking back on the dark ages of Flash and Actionscript 2 I believe that DataBinding has saved me countless lines of code. It&#039;s like saying, &quot;You be like so-and-so and if so-and-so changes then you do to. What a repetitive pain in the arse that was without DataBinding. And the source of lots of bugs in my code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a tough question to answer. How could we live without any of those. Take just one of them away and we just have &#8216;Fex&#8217;.</p>
<p>In thinking back on the dark ages of Flash and Actionscript 2 I believe that DataBinding has saved me countless lines of code. It&#8217;s like saying, &#8220;You be like so-and-so and if so-and-so changes then you do to. What a repetitive pain in the arse that was without DataBinding. And the source of lots of bugs in my code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

